the MORETIVATOR | 有种激励

Change! - Training on Successful Working Attitude
Indadi Utama Sdn. Bhd. | 18th August, 2007 | 8am - 4pm | 50 pax

Objectives:
1. To encourage positive working attitude between staffs and sales team.
2. Lead and inspire the organisation people through change management.

It’s a great honour for me to get invited to conduct an employee empowerment program on 18th Aug for Indadi Utama, a company based in Indonesia which is locally re-known for manufacturing and distributing sweets and beverage drinks.

I had a talk with the CEO, Mr. Frankie and gosh, that was the only time I knew they wanted to start the program after 2 days, which was also the only day their staffs gathered for a national quarterly meeting!

Yes, 2 days, I afraid this was not sufficient to workout a training syllabus especially in cater to one’s organisation need, moreover, I insisted that a training diagnosis must be done beforehand. I must say this was indeed a very rush project which I am sure, any trainers will unlikely to take up the challenge. However, without any hesitation, I took the challenge.

Forgive me, I am not the trainer who is keen to apply the same syllabus to any company. I believe every challenge lies an opportunity, this is also the main reason why I engaged this training despite time constraint.

The program started with an ice breaking session for the fellow participants who came from other indadi utama branches in the country. The ice-breaking session actually come with a moral value behind, in which the participants were to be identified what types of people they belong to in an organisation. The morning session were talking about Mark Twain’s 3 categories people in organisation: people who make things happened, people who watch things happened and those who are left to ask what did happen. It was fun with interactive dialogue and games in which they also learnt and realise the ability to foreseen oppurtunities against problems, as well as the power of change by taking action NOW!

The afternoon session, which I catered to be more active and energetic, were also fun-filled with non-stop team performing games. Knowing that the afternoon learning environment will tend to normally make participants more tire and sleepy, especially after lunch, the program was therefore being designed to be more ‘mobile’ in which the participants were not only sit and listen. Some activtity projects even require them to ‘move around’ with their seating chair, switched partners for different role-playing games, team-up for group discussion etc.

First, they were required to workout a advertising and promotion campaign for their company’s newly-launched products. With application to the reality TV show concept, every group will have to present their ideas to the panel judge who consisted of CEO and departmental managers. Every group will be questioned by the judges based on strategy creativity, promotional efforts and budget wise. Those came unprepared and appear ‘non-strategic’ will get eliminated.

Second, the groups again competed with each other in a sales persuasion games, whereby each groups were assigned to sell a product which was defeated, and even tear and worn. They must stand out from the problems, enforcing positive creativity and hard-selling their products out of impossibilities.

Overall, I am impressed with the multi-racial participants which were able to work in team well out of my expectation. Indadi Utama has demonstrated a good example in which, a high-standard of tolerance and acceptance among teams were managed to be created, despite different ethnic group, race, religion and education background of the fellow participants.

Thank you Indadi Utama for giving me another good testimonial of an effective training!

欧阳文风还没有回马（注意：不是来马，他本来就是马来西亚人）交流，在自由媒体论坛已经看到极不文雅、口不留情且没有逻辑可言的对话。

排除与情绪有关的活说，有种的且看这些网友怎么说：

网友1：插肛人可以来（来马搞讲座），为何璩美风当年不能来？两者差别在那里？ 网友2：同性恋违反常规的插肛性行为，大马是合法的吗？欧阳文风为何鼓吹？ 网友3：欧阳文风的讲题：”同”言无忌～一名男同性恋的告白，下次会不会有一名强奸犯的告白、一名偷窥狂的告白、一名恋童症的告白。。。？ 网友4：一名男同性恋告白什么？插肛之爽吗？

这些回应都有着一个共同点，即他们都有了一个共同的隐藏前提，而且他们都认为这个隐藏前提是百分正确的，因而以为推论也正确，所以最后拼命往自以为是的结论里抛。重点是：为什么有人企图把当事人等同于”插肛的人”与“同性恋等同于违反常规”？这些大前提必然吗？如果不必然，则推论也必不然。这就是讲话只讲结论，没有包含正确前提的典型谬误。

不能只讲结论，一定要包含必然前提，是发言的首要原则。我们都是有脑的人，当然不会允许站不住脚的结论无限量扩大而继续“妖言惑众”。这是最基础的逻辑。即使不懂逻辑，稍微有质疑精神的人都会对这些莫名其妙的前提与结论感到怀疑。如果相关的对话逻辑没有告诉我们A，但是B却莫名其妙的成立了，世人一定冲着结论展开很多疑问。不必然的前提，不可能推论出必然的结论，也不可能莫名其妙的成立了结论。

有鉴于此，为了求证，相关的驳论出来了：“你怎么知道我好肛交？”、“不是同志不能探讨这类课题吗？”、“什么叫做常规？常规哪里来？”，或者比较不留情的则会问：

“你被我x过吗？不然怎知我插肛？” “当政府在探讨同性恋应不应合法化，是不是整个政府都是同志才能探讨？” “违反常规就是不合法，那口交呢？口交合法吗？违反常规不是吗？” “肛交只是同性恋者的事吗？” “男女性行为最合法了，探讨性行为教育是不是鼓吹性泛滥？”

这以上的一系列挑战前提与结论的问题都是有道理的。倘若回应者论证不到其必然性，那就意味着这些推论本来就推不出一个“所以然”来，这样便与诬赖、无理取闹没有分别，也就是逻辑学所说的”不合乎逻辑发言”。

逻辑是说话的圣经。所以当事人必须对课题深入研究、胸有成竹，方能“应付得当”。相同的，对方也应该做好功课。但是有人却因为经不起逻辑这一关，正当论证不到的时候还硬着脸皮，说什么对方有备而来、对手的口才太强等。其实，有备而来有错吗？说口才强不如说逻辑架构上与内容事实上已正确发言；难道不准备、不研究、不思考而乱吠，推论就出来了吗？逻辑人绝不干这种丢脸的事。

就例如当我们说：“我要吃东西”，隐藏的前提是什么？最基本的理由前提就是～“我饿了”。但是还是有很多人以为他的想法是正确的，因而推论了很多自以为是的结论，如：“你可能不饿”、“你装饿”、“你饱了还要吃”等，所以谬误连篇的问题出现了：

1. 你不饿，你为什么来？ 2. 你不饿都可以来，为什么乞丐不能来？两者差别在那里？ 3. 我不喜欢你不饿也来讨吃，这是合理的吗？为什么你鼓吹乞丐文化？ 4. 一个乞丐告白什么？讨吃的快活吗？

重点是：你怎么知道我不饿？乞丐非要等同于“饿而讨吃的人”不行吗？如果不确定，为什么还“以此类推”？这就是自以为是的结论的例子。从以上的逻辑看来～“你不饿”的结论是谁推论出来的？这段逻辑有告诉我们什么吗？所以，“自以为是”的逻辑不能成立，这是自创逻辑，也可以说是特套逻辑。隐藏前提不正确，不代表我们可以把胡乱的猜测变成结论，这有偷天换日之嫌。这种也就是俗说的：搬弄是非人的表现。

看到了吗？同样的逻辑形式，你听到说：“有人来分享同志课题，鼓吹插肛之爽！” 你认为结论正确吗？

你觉得有人说话狗屁不通。曾几何时，我们也这么认为我们是狗屁不通的呢？

重点：不能只讲结论，一定要包含必然前提，是逻辑发言的首要原则。